DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 20.7% less intelligence, 7.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 258.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 27.6 | −20.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 20.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,165.00 | +7.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 7.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 55.12s | +258.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 258.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill