DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 18.2 points higher (34.8 vs 16.6) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $576; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ring-2.6-1T.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 16.6 | −52.3% Ring-2.6-1T is 52.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $575.60 | −46.8% Ring-2.6-1T is 46.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.08s | 24.47s | +52.2% Ring-2.6-1T is 52.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ring-2.6-1T vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 52.3% less intelligence, 46.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill