DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 9.9 points higher (34.3 vs 24.4) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $121; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 24.4 | −28.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 28.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $121.20 | −39.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 39.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.91s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.11 / $0.23 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 28.9% less intelligence, 39.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill