DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 1.7 points higher (36.0 vs 34.3) but costs 5.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 36.0 | +5.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 5.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,122.27 | +462.2% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 5.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 25.87s | +46.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 46.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 5.0% more intelligence, 462.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill