DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 5.0% less intelligence, 2015.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 32.6 | −5.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 5.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $4,222.12 | +2015.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 21× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.91s | 16.65s | −7.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 7.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill