DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 15.9 points higher (50.2 vs 34.3) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 50.2 | +46.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 46.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $521.32 | +161.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.12s | 45.58s | +151.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 151.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 46.4% more intelligence, 161.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 151.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill