DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 11.1 points higher (45.4 vs 34.3) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $201; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 45.4 | +32.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 32.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $200.88 | $364.95 | +81.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 81.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.21s | 27.17s | +34.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 34.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 32.4% more intelligence, 81.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 41.30 for $175.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill