DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 11.5 points higher (45.8 vs 34.3) but costs 7.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 45.8 | +33.5% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 33.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,536.78 | +669.8% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 7.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.12s | 12.01s | −33.7% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 33.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 33.5% more intelligence, 669.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill