DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs gpt-oss-20b (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 25.3 points higher (34.3 vs 9.0) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $28.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 9.0 | −73.8% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 73.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $28.81 | −85.6% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 85.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 16.79s | −4.8% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 4.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.05 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
gpt-oss-20b (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 73.8% less intelligence, 85.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)gpt-oss-20b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-oss-20b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-oss-20b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill