DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 0.8 points higher (35.1 vs 34.3) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 35.1 | +2.3% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 2.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $613.92 | +207.5% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 13.33s | −24.4% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 24.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 2.3% more intelligence, 207.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill