DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 12.0 points higher (46.3 vs 34.3) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $200; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 46.3 | +35.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 35.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $3,880.88 | +1844.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 19× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.94s | 25.34s | +41.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 41.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 35.0% more intelligence, 1844.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill