DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 8.4 points higher (42.7 vs 34.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $200; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 42.7 | +24.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 24.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $283.18 | +41.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 41.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.94s | 23.83s | +32.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 32.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 24.5% more intelligence, 41.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill