DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 4.1 points higher (38.4 vs 34.3) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 38.4 | +12.0% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 12.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,607.86 | +705.4% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 25.73s | +45.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 45.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 12.0% more intelligence, 705.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill