DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 58.6% less intelligence, 533.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 14.2 | −58.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 58.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,263.80 | +533.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 6.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 17.66s | +0.2% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 0.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill