DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 16.8 points higher (34.3 vs 17.5) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 17.5 | −49.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 49.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $145.77 | −27.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 27.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 24.76s | +40.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 40.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 49.0% less intelligence, 27.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill