DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 1.7% less intelligence, 569.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 228.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 33.7 | −1.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 1.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,336.09 | +569.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 6.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.12s | 59.47s | +228.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 228.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill