DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (High) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (High) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (High) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 41.1 | +36.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 36.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,014.56 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.38s | 13.66s | −48.2% Ling 3.1 Flash is 48.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424-high/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424-high/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill