DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 3.9 points higher (34.3 vs 30.4) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $277; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 30.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when 30.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 34.3 | +12.8% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 12.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $1,012.50 | +265.1% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.98s | 31.40s | −34.6% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 34.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 12.8% more intelligence, 265.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)GLM-5.3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill