DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 20.5 points higher (50.9 vs 30.4) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $277; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 30.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when 30.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 50.9 | +67.4% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 67.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $2,925.01 | +954.8% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.21s | 70.71s | +46.7% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 46.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 67.4% more intelligence, 954.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)GPT-6 Astra (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill