DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 13.8% more intelligence, 75.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 34.6 | +13.8% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 13.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $66.81 | −75.9% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 75.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.62s | 28.14s | −42.1% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 42.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill