DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 19.3 points higher (30.4 vs 11.1) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $53.1; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 11.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 11.1 | −63.5% Granite 4.2 8B is 63.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $53.07 | −80.9% Granite 4.2 8B is 80.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.87s | 39.25s | −19.7% Granite 4.2 8B is 19.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Granite 4.2 8B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 63.5% less intelligence, 80.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Granite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill