DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 16.4 points higher (30.4 vs 14.0) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 14.0 | −53.9% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 53.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $250.37 | −9.7% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 9.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 5.86s | −87.9% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 87.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 53.9% less intelligence, 9.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill