DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 4.7 points higher (35.1 vs 30.4) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $277; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 35.1 | +15.5% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 15.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $613.92 | +121.4% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.95s | 13.02s | −72.8% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 72.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 15.5% more intelligence, 121.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill