DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 21.1 points higher (30.4 vs 9.3) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 9.3 | −69.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 69.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $43.98 | −84.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 84.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.95s | 10.37s | −78.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 78.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 69.4% less intelligence, 84.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill