DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 23.3 points higher (30.4 vs 7.1) but costs 10.0× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 7.1 | −76.6% Mistral Small 3.1 is 76.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $27.82 | −90.0% Mistral Small 3.1 is 90.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.98s | 11.75s | −75.5% Mistral Small 3.1 is 75.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 76.6% less intelligence, 90.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill