DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 9.2 points higher (39.6 vs 30.4) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $277; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 30.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when 30.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 39.6 | +30.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 30.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $1,385.40 | +399.6% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 5.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.98s | 22.03s | −54.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 54.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 30.3% more intelligence, 399.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill