DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)
Qwen3.7 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 3.0% less intelligence, 721.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 29.5 | −3.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $2,277.12 | +721.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.98s | 16.62s | −65.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 65.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill