DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 16.6 points higher (37.0 vs 20.4) but costs 7.6× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $451; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 37.0 | +81.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 81.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $3,410.76 | +656.7% GPT-5.5 (High) is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 19.56s | +190.2% GPT-5.5 (High) is 190.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 81.4% more intelligence, 656.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 190.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill