DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) scores 4.9 points higher (20.4 vs 15.5) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($451 vs $23.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 15.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 15.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 15.5 | −24.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 24.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $22.97 | −94.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 94.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.58s | 4.98s | −24.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 24.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 24.0% less intelligence, 94.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.3% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill