DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) scores 17.6 points higher (38.0 vs 20.4) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1187 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 38.0 | +86.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 86.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,186.77 | +163.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.57s | 36.37s | +453.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 453.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 86.3% more intelligence, 163.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 453.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill