DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 32.3 points higher (52.7 vs 20.4) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $451; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 52.7 | +158.3% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $5,324.10 | +1081.1% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 280.51s | +4061.9% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 4061.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 158.3% more intelligence, 1081.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4061.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill