DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 23.9 points higher (44.3 vs 20.4) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (High) when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.6 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 44.3 | +117.2% Grok 4.6 (High) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,962.90 | +335.5% Grok 4.6 (High) is 4.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.85s | 34.63s | +405.5% Grok 4.6 (High) is 405.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 117.2% more intelligence, 335.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 405.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.6 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/grok-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/grok-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill