DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 22.4 points higher (42.8 vs 20.4) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 42.8 | +109.8% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,557.04 | +245.4% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.85s | 33.02s | +382.0% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 382.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 109.8% more intelligence, 245.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 382.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.6 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill