DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 24.0% more intelligence, 66.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 388.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 25.3 | +24.0% Hy3 is 24.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $149.61 | −66.8% Hy3 is 66.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | 33.29s | +388.8% Hy3 is 388.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill