DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 34.7 points higher (55.1 vs 20.4) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $451; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 55.1 | +170.1% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $3,117.31 | +591.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 6.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 46.58s | +591.1% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 591.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 170.1% more intelligence, 591.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 591.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill