DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 27.5% more intelligence, 48.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 624.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 26.0 | +27.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 27.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $231.08 | −48.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 48.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.84s | 49.58s | +624.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 624.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill