DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) scores 9.2 points higher (20.4 vs 11.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($451 vs $329; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 11.2 | −45.1% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 45.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $328.86 | −27.0% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 27.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 43.21s | +541.1% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 541.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.14 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 45.1% less intelligence, 27.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 541.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill