DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 13.3 points higher (33.7 vs 20.4) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1336 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 33.7 | +65.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 65.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,336.09 | +196.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 58.77s | +772.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 772.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 65.2% more intelligence, 196.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 772.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill