DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) scores 5.8 points higher (26.2 vs 20.4) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1060 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 26.2 | +28.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 28.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,060.08 | +135.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.55s | 55.56s | +748.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 748.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 28.4% more intelligence, 135.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 748.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill