DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 95.1% more intelligence, 19.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 649.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 39.8 | +95.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 95.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $362.72 | −19.5% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 19.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 50.49s | +649.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 649.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill