DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 3.7 points higher (24.1 vs 20.4) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Solar Mini 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 24.1 | +18.1% Solar Mini 4 is 18.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $502.02 | +11.4% Solar Mini 4 is 11.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | 27.46s | +303.2% Solar Mini 4 is 303.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 18.1% more intelligence, 11.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 303.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill