DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 6.2 points higher (26.6 vs 20.4) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Solar Pro 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 26.6 | +30.4% Solar Pro 4 is 30.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $736.82 | +63.5% Solar Pro 4 is 63.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 30.4% more intelligence, 63.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill