DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 19.9 points higher (36.0 vs 16.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $823; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 16.1 | −55.3% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 55.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $822.85 | −26.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 26.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.78s | 27.13s | +5.2% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 5.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 55.3% less intelligence, 26.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill