DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 34.6 points higher (57.7 vs 23.1) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $1402; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 23.1, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 57.7 | +149.8% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,401.88 | $5,903.03 | +321.1% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.59s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 149.8% more intelligence, 321.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-4-carbon-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-4-carbon-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill