DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 33.1% less intelligence, 35.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 347.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 24.1 | −33.1% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 33.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $1,524.02 | +35.8% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 35.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 115.75s | +347.4% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 347.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill