DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 20.5 points higher (36.0 vs 15.5) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $23.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 15.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 15.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 15.5 | −56.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 56.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $22.97 | −98.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 98.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.63s | 4.98s | −81.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 81.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 56.9% less intelligence, 98.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill