DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 16.9% more intelligence, 77.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 42.1 | +16.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 16.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $250.48 | −77.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 77.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.88s | 12.46s | −51.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 51.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill