DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Inkling Small
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Inkling Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 10.3 points higher (36.0 vs 25.7) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $241; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.7, and Inkling Small when 25.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Inkling Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 25.7 | −28.6% Inkling Small is 28.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $240.85 | −78.5% Inkling Small is 78.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.78s | 12.67s | −50.9% Inkling Small is 50.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech |
Inkling Small vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 28.6% less intelligence, 78.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Inkling SmallToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/inkling-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/inkling-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill