DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 26.7 points higher (36.0 vs 9.3) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 9.3 | −74.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 74.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $43.98 | −96.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 96.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.92s | 10.82s | −58.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 58.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 74.2% less intelligence, 96.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill