DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 29.0 points higher (36.0 vs 7.0) but costs 9.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 7.0 | −80.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 80.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $121.78 | −89.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 89.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.63s | 9.82s | −63.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 63.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 80.6% less intelligence, 89.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill